Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade assistance for New Zealanders abroad not unreasonable

Foreign Affairs and Trade
Legislation:
Ombudsmen Act 1975
Legislation display text:
Ombudsmen Act 1975
Agency:
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Ombudsman:
John Belgrave
Case number(s):
W52293
Issue date:
Format:
HTML,
PDF,
Word
Language:
English

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) provided advice to complainants held by school authorities in China—acted in accordance with international consular practice as set out in Vienna Convention—MFAT assistance limited to providing information and cannot interfere with decisions made by other countries      

The complainant believed that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) has not assisted their family adequately when family members were held by school authorities in China and were seeking repatriation to New Zealand from Hong Kong.

The NZ Embassy in China spoke to the complainants by telephone while they were in China and understood from them that the local police had been contacted and had visited the school.

The New Zealand Consulate-General in Hong Kong facilitated contact with the complainants’ mother in New Zealand for payment of airfares to New Zealand. The Ombudsman considered that MFAT had acted in accordance with international consular practice as set out in the Vienna Convention. The Ombudsman advised the complainant that MFAT assistance is limited to providing information and guidance and facilitating contact with family, friends and others to help New Zealanders who are in trouble overseas to resolve their own problems. MFAT cannot interfere in decisions made by other countries and is not funded to repatriate New Zealanders. The complaint was not sustained.

This case note is published under the authority of the Ombudsmen Rules 1989. It sets out an Ombudsman’s view on the facts of a particular case. It should not be taken as establishing any legal precedent that would bind an Ombudsman in future.

Last updated: