Resources and publications
Ngā rauemi me ngā tānga
Search guides, case notes, opinions, reports and other information. Resources and publications can also be searched by date and other options.
Use the search bar to make your search. Then use the filters to narrow down the results by resource type or topic.
More information about the resource categories on this page
Guides
Commonly used guides include:
- The OIA for Ministers and agencies
- The LGOIMA for local government agencies
- Making official information requests: a guide for requesters
Detailed guidance on the official information legislation and aspects of good administrative practice.
We also have guidance on disability rights and protected disclosures.
Case notes and opinions
Case notes are a short case summary, often demonstrating an aspect of a case.
An Ombudsman's Opinion is published where there is public interest in showing the full details of a case.
Reports
Reports include OPCAT, disability rights, official information practice and systemic investigation.
Outreach
Contains our media releases, newsletters, pamphlets, speeches and fact sheets. Fact sheets are published in multiple language and accessible formats.
Corporate documents
This includes our annual reports and strategic intentions.
Projects, reference and data
This includes our official information complaints data, updates on investigations and other projects, and submissions by the Ombudsman.
View all projects, reference and data
Template letters and work sheets
These template letters and work sheets can be used by agencies to help respond to official information requests.
194 Resources Show all
Request for Court Registrar’s report
Case notesReport on aborted trial released with deletions—‘free and frank expressions of opinion’ by Registrar—no public interest overrideRequest by parents for medical records of 13 year old daughter
Case notesRequest for medical records—information about parents and child refused under s 9(2)(a)—during review girl consulted—information released other than therapy transcriptsRequest for advice relating to remuneration packages of executives involved in sale of SOEs
Case notesRequest for advice on remuneration packages of executives involved in the sale of SOEs— privacy issues—s 9(2)(a)—remuneration package released subject to deletion of dollar figures.Request for recruitment video
Case notesRequest for copy of video commissioned for overseas recruitment—privacy of individual officers appearing in it—s 9(2)(a)—privacy interest not strong—public interest outweighs any privacy interest—s 9(1)—how Treasury sees its role and how it presents that image to potential recruits both in New Zealand and overseas is a matter of strong public interestRequest for polytechnic financial report
Case notesFinancial report not free and frank expression of opinion—linkage between information and expression of opinion—what constitutes improper pressure or harassment—section 9(2)(g)(i) not a ground for exclusion of public from meetingRequest for copies of referee reports
Case notesA requester sought copies of referee reports in respect of course she had applied for—refused under s 27(1)(c)—two reports subsequently released with the referees’ consent—third report was evaluative material—implied promise of confidentiality had been provided to the referee—whether other factors made it unfair to withhold—s 23 relevant—institute could withhold report if a statement of reasons was providedRequest for documents prepared for Minister regarding Treaty of Waitangi claims
Case notesDue particularity and duty to provide reasonable assistance—s 12(2) and 13Request for information relating to application to re-join the Police
Case notesRequest for information relating to application to re-join the Police—information withheld was ‘evaluative material’—disclosure of the information would have breached an implied promise of confidentiality—relevance of s 23—essence of the evaluative material made available to the requester in summary formJurisdiction—Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Committee
Case notesInformation held by the Medical Practitioners’ Disciplinary Committee not ‘official information’Jurisdiction—information held by Arbitration Commission
Case notesOfficial information definition— Arbitration Commission not subject to Act—whether information deemed to be held by Department of Labour—whether information held by officers or members as agents of CommissionRequest for funding applications made to Union Incentives Trust
Case notesInformation held by Department of Labour relating to Union Incentives Trust—whether held solely as agentRequest for sites of rain recording stations
Case notesRequest for sites of rain recording stations in Tararua ranges—concern about vandalism and prejudice to measures protecting health or safety of members of the public—s 7(2)(d) did not applyRequest for legal opinion regarding first application to be granted by Minister under section 188 of the Resource Management Act
Case notesRequest for legal opinion regarding first application under s 188 of Resource Management Act to be granted by Minister—information withheld under s 9(2)(h)—no waiver—no countervailing public interest considerations warranting disclosureRequest for psychologist’s report prepared for Accident Compensation Corporation
Case notesReport by psychologist acting as independent contractor—contents of report related to requester and third party—balance to be struck between right of requester to personal information and privacy interests of third party—provision of summary of personal information in the reportRequest for identity of medical advisers who had provided expert opinion to Department of Health
Case notesRequest for identity of medical advisers—need to ensure continued provision of medical advice on value of medicines—consultation with advisers—with one exception, no prejudice to the supply of similar information or information from the same sourceRequest for audio and video tapes relating to allegations of child abuse
Case notesAudio and video tapes relating to allegations of child abuse—relevance of Family Court proceedings—mixed Part 2 and Part 4 informationRequest by convicted rapist for details of compensation claim by rape victim
Case notesRequest by convicted rapist for details of compensation claim by rape victim—conviction under appeal—privacy of victim—s 9(2)(a)—public interest in right to justice—s 9(1)—summary provided—s 16(1)(e)Request for information relating to expenditure of school money
Case notesRequest for minutes of, and reports to, a Board of Trustees’ meetings relating to expenditure of school monies—privacy interests of the Principal and Executive Officer¬—accountability for spending public moneyRequest for legal advice used in formulation of mining policy
Case notesRequest for legal advice—refused under s 9(2)(h)—necessary to maintain legal professional privilege—not outweighed by public interest favouring disclosureRequest for information on consular file
Case notesAccess to information on consular file—refusal based on ‘class’ approach—principle of availability in s 5—information provided in summary form—s 16(e)Request for quotation submitted by a Government Department
Case notesRequester sought quotation information—amount apportioned by the department as royalties and copyright charges formed part of the department’s marketing and pricing strategy within a competitive market—also in circumstances of this case release of quotation would enable a calculation of how the quotation was made upRequest for price of successful tender to supply medical product
Case notesNo unreasonable prejudice—public interest in release to promote integrity and transparency of tender processRequest for amounts paid to private sector consultants for asset sale advice
Case notesRequest for amounts paid to private sector consultants for asset sale advice—initially refused under ss 9(2)(b)(ii) and 9(2)(j)—not possible to deduce individual fee structures or methodology from the information at issue—s 9(2)(b)(ii) did not apply—information at issue would be, at most, of a background nature (since it related to a different transaction) and was at a high level of generality—s 9(2)(j) did not apply—while the information might be considered by firms in deciding whether to pitch a proposal for a particular advisory contract, s 9(2)(i) not satisfied—argument that disclosure may result in a reduction in number of advisors willing to undertake Government work not persuasive due to the vigorous competition for the contracts—strong public interest in release to permit scrutiny of the level of expenditure and questions to be asked about the use of advisers and the decisions that have been takenRequest for communications between Taranaki Harbours Board and Topside Construction Joint Venture
Case notesRequest for communications between Harbours Board and TCJV concerning difficulties in the sharing of costs of preparatory work on consents for a reclamation—Board ‘neither confirms nor denies the existence or non-existence’ of the information—reference to s 7(2)(b)—Ombudsman not satisfied that confirming the existence of information relevant to the request would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of TCJV—Board continued to refuse the request under s 7(2)(i)—good reason to withhold only some of the information—Board agreed to release information and to reconsider the balance when the negotiations over the dispute had been completedRequest for gradings awarded to funding applications to Foundation for Research, Science and Technology
Case notesRequest for gradings of funding applications to Foundation for Research, Science and Technology—information withheld under s 9(2)(b)(ii)—commercial position of applicants would be prejudiced by identifying grades awarded to each application—Foundation’s agreement to provide numbers of gradings without identifying information adequately met the public interest in disclosureCrown unreasonably delays negotiation for sale or lease of crown land
Case notesUnreasonable delay in negotiations for sale or lease of Crown land—events overtaken by Cabinet directive to place surplus Crown land in land bank for Treaty of Waitangi claimsSchool Board suspends 14 year old contrary to law
Case notesA 14 year-old boy suspended for an unspecified period—contrary to law—student later allowed back to school twice more—the Board ‘reinstated’ the suspension twice more when the student’s behaviour deteriorated—under the Education Act the Board must specify the period of suspension—as this was not done, the suspension expired after 7 days and therefore, could not be ‘reinstated’ at a later time—the Board agreed to review its suspension and expulsion procedures to bring them in line with the requirements under the ActLocal Authority should share project overrun costs with residents
Case notesComplaint concerned water supply and sewerage scheme which involved 50/50 cost sharing between residents and Council—cost overrun occurred and residents asked to pay the entire overrun—Ombudsman considered this unreasonable, particularly as the residents not informed about the overrun and that the overrun amount should be shared 50/50 between Council and residents—Council accepted this viewCrown Health Enterprise reminded to exercise discretionary powers reasonably
Case notesUnreasonable decision to charge two fees where patient in hospital for period falling into two financial yearsDepartment of Conservation enables arbitration when rents disputed by licensees occupying foreshore reserve in Marlborough Sounds
Case notesForeshore rentals charged—lack of appeal mechanism—Department of Conservation agreed to establish a rental arbitration clause in the Marlborough Sounds foreshore licences to enable licensees to challenge rental increases where conflict arose—Ombudsman did not uphold the complaint (about level of rental increase) but the outcome achieved ensures rental increases can be challenged in futureDepartment of Conservation’s actions concerning lease approval were unreasonable, causing stress and financial loss to complainant
Case notesA marine farming company applied for lease under Marine Farming Act—farm already in existence when application made under new legislation—DOC rejected new lease on basis it interfered with public’s usage—matter to go to Planning Tribunal—DOC then approved lease just before Tribunal hearing—complainants claimed the whole process unfair—Ombudsman investigated—DOC agrees to make ex gratia payment to complainantsNew Zealand Qualifications Authority and remarked paper with miscalculated mark
Case notesCorrection of arithmetical error in raw marks—remarking reduced mark—no effect on final scaled mark