November 25, 2015
New Zealand's Independent Monitoring Mechanism (comprising the Office of the Ombudsman, the Human Rights Commission and the Convention Coalition Monitoring Group) has published a guide on reasonable accommodation of persons with disabilities. The guide is aimed at assisting persons with disabilities to understand their rights to request reasonable accommodation. It also aims to inform employers, state sector agencies, and other persons providing services to the public, of their obligation to provide reasonable accommodation to persons with disabilities in particular circumstances.
We hope that this guide will provide useful and practical guidance on the concept of reasonable accommodation to a broad audience. We believe that the guide echoes the principles of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and advocates for human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons with disabilities.
The guide is available in pdf and Microsoft Word formats. It will also be available in easy read format shortly, and is available in Braille on request. You can read the full guide on our home page at Resources & Publications/Guides/Good Administration Guides.
November 2, 2015
The Chief Ombudsman, Dame Beverley Wakem, has renewed her call for requesters to tell her about their experience of accessing official information from government agencies. The surveys, which can be accessed from our website, close at midnight on Thursday 5 November. Dame Beverley says "I strongly urge requesters to use this opportunity to provide me with their views, so I have the strongest possible evidence for my review." Read the full media release here.
October 23, 2015
As part of the Chief Ombudsman's review of OIA practices, we are now asking people to complete surveys for requesters and government workers.
October 19, 2015
The Ombudsman has today released a case note on the status of Needs Assessment and Service Co-ordination agencies (NASCs) under the Official Information Act (OIA). NASCs are held to be independent contractors engaged by the Ministry of Health, and information held by them in their contractual capacity is deemed to be held by the Ministry for the purposes of the OIA. You can read the case note here.
October 15, 2015
The Office of the Ombudsman's Annual Report for the year 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015 was tabled in Parliament this afternoon, which recorded that it had received the second highest amount of work ever and was able to complete 92% of complaints and other work within six months. You can read the full report here and the Office's media statement here.
October 13, 2015
The Chief Ombudsman has released a short statement on the High Court decison released earlier today about the Minister of Trade's decision on an OIA request for certain information relating to the TPPA. You can read the statement here.
September 25, 2015
The Ombudsman has published an opinion on a request for details of Ministry of Health staff working on vaccine approvals. The request had been refused under section 9(2)(a) of the Official Information Act 1982 in order to protect the privacy of natural persons. Section 9(2)(a) and section 9(2)(g)(ii) provided good reason to refuse parts of the requests, but the balance of the information ought not to have been withheld. You can read the Ombudsman's opinion here.
September 1, 2015
The Winter edition of the Ombudsman Quarterly review e-newsletter is now available.
August 19, 2015
The Officers of Parliament Select Committee today announced its recommendation that Judge Peter Boshier be appointed as Ombudsman from 10 December 2015, and that he undertake the role of Chief Ombudsman on the retirement of Dame Beverley Wakem later this year.
The Select Committee’s announcement can be viewed here.
August 13, 2015
The Ombudsman has released his opinion on a complaint about how the Ministry of Education managed the 2008 national school bus transport tender process. Professor Paterson concludes that the Ministry did not follow aspects of the process it had specified it would follow in the invitation for tenders ("the RFP"). Specifically, it failed to follow the appropriate process for notifying changes to the RFP, did not appropriately assess what were "acceptable" buses, allowed certain tenderers to bid for more bus routes than they were entitled to, and failed to treat one operator's bids for certain groupings as feasible through an inappropriate interpretation of the RFP. You can read the full opinion here.
Back to top ↑