Ombudsman - Fairness for All

Office of the Ombudsman | Tari o te Kaitiaki Mana Tangata


  • Accessibility
  • Sitemap
  • FAQs
  • Contact us
  • Home
  • About us
    • Who is the Ombudsman?
    • History
    • Past Ombudsmen
    • Legislation
    • Organisational structure
    • Recruitment
  • What we do
    • >Protecting your rights
      • Protected disclosures/whistle-blowing
      • Monitoring places of detention
      • Disabilities Convention
    • >Investigations
      • Complaints about state sector agencies
      • Complaints about access to official information
      • Self-initiated investigations
      • Wider administrative improvement investigations
    • >Improve fairness for all
      • Advice and guidance
      • Outreach activities and speaking engagements
      • Training and education
      • International work
  • Who else can help
  • Make a complaint
    • Complaining about state sector agencies
    • Complaining about access to official information
    • >Make a complaint
      • Make a complaint online now
      • Make a complaint by email, fax or letter
  • Resources & publications
    • Search resources & publications
    • >Guides
      • Good administration guides
      • Official information legislation guides
      • Official information subject guides
    • OQR
    • >Opinions
      • Official information opinions
      • Ombudsmen Act opinions
    • >Case notes
      • Official information case notes
      • Ombudsmen Act case notes
    • Reports
    • >Corporate documents
      • Annual reports
      • Statements of intent
      • Protocols with agencies
      • Disabilities Convention annual reports
      • OPCAT annual reports
    • Submissions
    • >General information
      • Fact sheets on common agency complaints
      • Pamphlets in English
      • New Zealand Sign Language videos
      • Teaching resources
      • >Immigration residual places remedy
        • Details of the remedy
        • Remedy Assessment Form
        • Case note explaining the Ombudsman's investigation
        • News item advising of the remedy in different languages
        • Media release
  • Newsroom
    • All News
    • Press releases
    • Speeches
    • OQR E-newsletters
  • Skip to content [Accesskey 'C']
  • Skip to navigation [Accesskey 'N']
  • Newsroom>
  • Chief Ombudsman recommends regular and proactive disclosure of information about Ministerial conflicts of interest
  • All News
  • Press releases
  • Speeches
  • OQR E-newsletters

Chief Ombudsman recommends regular and proactive disclosure of information about Ministerial conflicts of interest Loading Comments…

Chief Ombudsman | January 31, 2013


The Prime Minister and Cabinet have approved a system of regular and proactive publication of information about the management of Ministerial conflicts of interest from 30 September 2013 as a result of the Chief Ombudsman’s investigation into the Cabinet Office’s refusal of a series of requests for such information. The Ombudsmen will have a monitoring and audit role to ensure the information that is released is a fair summary of the fuller details recorded by the Cabinet Office.

Dame Beverley Wakem’s opinion, released today, was that the “good government” provisions of the Official Information Act provided good reason to withhold both Ministers’ declarations of interest at Cabinet and Cabinet Committees and correspondence between Ministers and the Cabinet Office about actual or possible conflicts of interest.  However, Dame Beverley did not believe there was good reason to withhold all of the information requested concerning actions taken to manage identified conflicts of interest.

Dame Beverley considered that the degree of transparency necessary to maintain public trust and confidence can only be achieved by regular and proactive publication of a summary of actions taken when Ministerial conflicts of interest are identified. 

The Prime Minister accepted Dame Beverley’s view that the public interest in transparency about how Ministerial conflicts of interest are handled requires a proactive disclosure regime.   Public trust and confidence in the good government of New Zealand would suffer if there was insufficient transparency about measures taken to manage Ministerial conflicts of interest. 

You can read the Chief Ombudsman’s full opinion here.

Back to top ↑

Comments

comments powered by Disqus Back to top ↑

Other organisations that can help

  • Site Map
  • Contact us
  • Feedback
  • About this Site
  • Accessibility features
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • newzealand.govt.nz